Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

In vitro evaluation of the inhibitory effect of 3, 5-dichloro-2-pyridone on Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv

Lin Ling1, Chen Ling1, Hua Wu1

1Department of Pharmacy, Binhu Hospital of Heifei City, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230031; 2Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China.

For correspondence:-  Hua Wu   Email: haileyadams435@yahoo.com   Tel:+8655165758263

Accepted: 12 December 2019        Published: 01 February 2020

Citation: Ling L, Ling C, Wu H. In vitro evaluation of the inhibitory effect of 3, 5-dichloro-2-pyridone on Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Trop J Pharm Res 2020; 19(1):163-168 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v19i1.24

© 2020 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the anti-tuberculosis potential of twelve commercially available pyridone analogues against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain.
Methods: Twelve commercially available pyridone-based compounds were screened against M. tuberculosis H37Rv using different susceptibility tests. The most active or lead compound was further evaluated in detail for its anti-tuberculosis (anti-TB) potential. Kill kinetics was used to determine the dynamics of its anti-TB activity in vitro.  
Results: Compounds d, j and k were potent against M. tuberculosis H37Rv, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 10, 5 and 10 µg/mL, respectively. The standard anti-TB drugs used in this study (positive control drugs) demonstrated MIC of 2.5 µg/mL. The anti-TB effect of compound j was comparable with those of the standard drugs (RIF, LVX, AMK, EMB and INH). The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of compound j was 10 µg/mL. It produced an MIC of 5 µg/mL in agar proportion method (APM). However, its MIC in Middlebrook 7H9 broth supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 4 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) increased 4- and 8-fold, respectively. The bactericidal effect of compound j was time- and concentration-dependent at dilutions above 2x MIC. Combination of compound j with RIF, LVX or AMK exhibited fractional inhibitory concentration index (ΣFIC) of 1, indicative of additive drug-drug interactions. However, combination with INH or EMB produced a ΣFIC of 2. None of the tested drug combinations was antagonistic. 
Conclusion: Compound j exhibits potent time- and concentration-dependent antimicrobial effect against M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Thus, it may be suitable as an adjunct to current treatment of drug sensitive and drug-resistant TB. 

Keywords: Tuberculosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pyridone analogs, Antimicrobial activity, Antibiotics

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates